LITIGATION REPORT,
October 2007
Recent Decisions
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues &
Rights, Ltd. (United States Supreme Court)
-
Arguing for an
Interpretation of the “‘Strong Inference’ of Scienter” Requirement
under the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Consistent with
Congress’s Intention to Limit Frivolous “Strike Suits” under Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Cienega Gardens v. United States
(U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit)
-
Arguing that, When
a Regulatory Change Affects an Income-Producing Property, the “Parcel
as a Whole” Should Be the Expected Income Before the Regulation
Horn v. Southern Union Co.
(Rhode Island Supreme Court)
-
Advocating a
One-Year Statute of Limitations for All Employment Discrimination
Claims Brought Under Rhode Island’s Anti-Discrimination Statutes
Devine v. Nantucket
(Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court)
-
Arguing that an
Insufficiently Noticed and Improperly Recorded Eminent Domain Taking
is Ineffective Against a Subsequent Bona Fide Purchaser
Hanover Ins. Co. V. Rapo & Jepsen
Ins. Servs. (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court)
- Supporting the
Recognition under Massachusetts State Law of the Joint Defense
Privilege or Common Interest Rule
Pending Cases
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v.
Mattel, Inc. (United States Supreme Court)
-
Supporting Parties'
Freedom to Contract for Judicial Review of the Merits of Arbitral
Decisions
Fronk v. Fowler (Massachusetts
Appeals Court)
-
Supporting Parties'
Right to Control the Scope of Commercial Relationships
Ten Residents of Boston v. Boston
Redevelopment Authority (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court)
-
Opposing Judicial
Expansion of the Scope of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act
Warren Jepson v. Zoning Board of
Appeals of Ipswich
(Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court)
-
Supporting
Construction of Affordable Housing for Massachusetts Workers
Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Richard
Blumenthal (Connecticut Supreme Court)
-
Seeking
Clarification of the Connecticut Attorney General’s Confidentiality
Obligations in Connection with Civil Investigations under
Connecticut’s Antitrust Statute
Kwaak v. Pfizer Inc.
(Massachusetts Appeals Court)
-
Opposing Class
Certification under Chapter 93A Based on Purchases of a Deceptively
Advertised Product Where No Injury is Alleged
Skirchak v. Dynamics
Research Corporation
(United States Court
of Appeals for the First Circuit)
-
Arguing that a
Class-Action Waiver in an Employer’s ADR Program Requiring Arbitration
of Claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act Cannot be Held Per Se
Unconscionable
Scott v. NG US1, Inc.
(Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court)
-
Arguing that the
Corporate Veil Should Not be Pierced Unless the Parent’s Exercise
of Pervasive Control was Contemporaneous with the Activity of the
Subsidiary Giving Rise to Liability
Eigerman v. Putnam
Investments, Inc.
(Massachusetts
Supreme Judicial Court)
-
Urging Reversal of
a Massachusetts Appeals Court Decision that Misapplies the Doctrine of
Contract Waiver
Biogen IDEC MA Inc.
v. Cahill, Treasurer and Receiver General of Massachusetts
(Suffolk Superior
Court, Massachusetts, Business Litigation Session)
-
Urging Rejection
of “Emergency” Regulations of the Massachusetts Treasurer Effectively
Negating the Business-To-Business Exemption under the Massachusetts
Abandoned Property Statute
Fleece on Earth
v. Vermont Department of Labor
(Vermont Supreme
Court)
-
Defending
Independent Contractors in Vermont
FPL Energy Maine
Hydro LLC v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection
(Maine Supreme
Court)
-
Supporting
Reversal of an Agency Decision that Requires Owners of an Artificial
Water Storage Facility to Operate It as if It Were a Natural Lake
Elena Hall v.
Department of Environmental Protection
(Massachusetts
Division of Administrative Law Appeals)
-
Opposing the
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s Use of a
Recently Drawn “Historic” Mean High Tide Line to Define Coastal
Property Boundaries in Provincetown, Massachusetts
Stephens v. Global
NAPs
(Massachusetts Appeals Court)
-
Opposing the
Extension of Employer Liability under the Massachusetts Maternity
Leave Act Beyond the Act’s Eight-Week Maternity Leave Requirement
To obtain more information about our
cases, or for copies of briefs or citations to
opinions, please contact us.
|