New England Legal Foundation
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Annual Reports
    • Board of Directors
    • State Advisory Councils >
      • Connecticut
      • Maine
      • Massachusetts
      • New Hampshire
      • Rhode Island
      • Vermont
    • Trustees
    • Members
    • Staff
    • Job & Internship Opportunities
  • News & Events
  • Docket
  • Briefs
  • Donate
  • Contact

McGonagle  v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc

2/4/2010

 
Opposing Expansion of Consumer Protection Liability to Violations of Statutes Unrelated to Consumer Protection

This was a class action alleging that Home Depot had violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, G.L. c. 93A (“chapter 93A") by charging the class member excess sales tax on certain purchases.  Plaintiffs based their Chapter 93A claim on the Massachusetts Attorney General regulation 940 C.M.R. §3.16(3) (“AG regulation”), promulgated pursuant to Chapter 93A, which provides that the violation of any Massachusetts statutes “meant for the protection of the public’s health, safety or welfare” and “intended to provide the consumers of this Commonwealth protection” constitute an unfair or deceptive practice giving rise to potential liability under Chapter 93A.  

In its amicus brief in support of Home Depot, NELF argued that, in this case, the AG regulation did not provide a basis for a Chapter 93A claim. As NELF explained, the stated purpose of Chapter 93A is to protect consumers in their commercial relationships with businesses. Thus, NELF argued, the AG regulation is limited, both by its express terms and by the scope of its enabling legislation, to violation of state statutes enacted for the protection of consumers.  The Massachusetts sales tax code, the purpose of which is to raise revenue for the state, does not regulate the commercial relationship between consumers and retailers but instead addresses the tax obligations of both to the Commonwealth. NELF further argued that applying the AG regulation to matters beyond the scope of Chapter 93A would upset the legislative balance between the interests of businesses and consumers.  In its October 29, 2009, decision, the Appeals Court agreed with NELF’s position and dismissed the Chapter 93A claim.  The Court relied in part on the SJC’s recent decision in Feeney v. Dell, 454 Mass. 192 (2009) to conclude that a claim alleging the wrongful collection of  a sales tax is not a consumer claim under c. 93A because it does not address the business defendant’s commercial or profit-seeking purposes. Instead, the claim concerns the business’s efforts to fulfill its statutory duty to collect taxes on behalf of the Commonwealth.  

Embracing NELF’s reasoning, the Appeals Court stated that the claim does not address the relationship between retailer and consumer (the sole focus of c. 93A) but instead reaches the relationship between the government and the consumer as taxpayer.  Not only is this relationship outside Chapter 93A’s scope but it also falls within the exclusive province of the state tax code, a comprehensive statutory scheme that occupies the field of sales tax claims and provides the exclusive remedy of a tax abatement from the Commonwealth.





Comments are closed.

    The Docket

    To obtain a copy of any of NELF's briefs, contact us at info@nelfonline.org.

    Categories

    All
    1st Circuit Court Of Appeals
    2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    3rd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    Business Litigation Session
    CT
    CT Superior Court
    CT Supreme Court
    Employer Employee Relationships
    February 2018
    February 2019
    Government Regulation/Administration Of Justice
    MA
    MA Appeals Court
    MA Division Of Administrative Law Appeals
    March 2015
    MA Superior Court
    MA Supreme Judicial Court
    MA US District Court
    ME
    ME Supreme Judicial Court
    NH
    NH Supreme Court
    Property Rights
    RI
    RI Supreme Court
    SCOTUS
    United States Supreme Court
    US Court Of Appeals Federal Circuit
    US District Court ME
    VT
    VT Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    June 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    June 2011
    February 2011
    October 2010
    June 2010
    February 2010
    October 2009
    February 2009
    October 2008
    June 2008
    February 2008
    October 2007
    June 2007
    October 2006
    June 2006
    February 2006
    October 2005
    June 2005
    February 2005
    October 2004
    June 2004
    February 2004
    October 2003
    May 2003
    February 2003
    September 2002
    May 2002
    February 2002
    May 2001