New England Legal Foundation
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Annual Reports
    • Board of Directors
    • State Advisory Councils >
      • Connecticut
      • Maine
      • Massachusetts
      • New Hampshire
      • Rhode Island
      • Vermont
    • Trustees
    • Members
    • Staff
    • Job & Internship Opportunities
  • News & Events
  • Docket
  • Briefs
  • Donate
  • Contact

Melia v. Zenhire Inc. et al.

6/6/2012

 
Supporting Judicial Enforcement of a Choice of Forum Clause Requiring Plaintiff’s Claims Under the Massachusetts Wage Act to be Litigated in New York

At issue in this case was the enforceability of a forum selection clause in an out-of-state business’s employment contract with a Massachusetts executive employee. The plaintiff in the case is a Massachusetts resident; the defendant is his corporate employer, Zenhire, Inc., which is located in New York. Melia sued Zenhire in Massachusetts Superior Court for unpaid wages under Massachusetts law, even though his employment agreement requires all such claims to be adjudicated in the courts of New York and under New York substantive law. Despite the presumptive validity of forum selection clauses under Massachusetts law, Melia argued, in opposition to Zenhire’s motion to dismiss for improper venue, that the agreement’s forum selection clause should not be enforced because it operated in tandem with the choice of law clause to exempt Zenhire from liability under the Massachusetts Wage Act, contrary to Massachusetts public policy. The Superior Court rejected Melia’s arguments and enforced the forum selection clause, primarily because Massachusetts and New York both apply the same Restatement (Second) test in determining the validity of a choice of law clause. Melia appealed from the trial court’s dismissal, and the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) took the case sua sponte for direct appellate review. 

NELF filed an amicus brief in support of Zenhire, arguing that, since Massachusetts and New York follow the same Restatement (Second) test in determining the validity of a choice of law clause in a contract, enforcement of the forum selection clause was neither unfair nor unreasonable. That is, Melia would be just as free to challenge the validity of the New York choice of law clause in the courts of New York as in the courts of Massachusetts, and, for that reason, enforcement of the forum selection clause had no bearing on Melia’s challenge to the choice of law clause. Moreover, any doubts about the competence of the New York courts to recognize Massachusetts public policy in deciding the enforceability of the choice of law clause would be entirely speculative and would offend basic principles of interstate comity and reciprocity that animate both the United States Supreme Court’s and the SJC’s forum selection jurisprudence. NELF also pointed out that, consistent with the SJC’s instruction to evaluate the validity of a forum selection clause under the parties’ chosen law, the New York Court of Appeals has in fact rejected a virtually identical challenge to a forum selection clause brought by New York employees against their out-of-state employer. See Boss v. American Express Fin. Advisors, Inc., 844 N.E.2d 1142 (2006). Finally, NELF argued that a decision enforcing Zenhire’s forum selection clause would preserve the key principles of party autonomy and interstate comity that animate the modern view embracing forum selection clauses. 

On May 8, 2012, the SJC issued its decision agreeing with NELF’s analysis and enforcing the forum selection clause. The Court also announced a demanding three-part test which a Massachusetts employee must satisfy to defeat a forum selection clause.

Comments are closed.

    The Docket

    To obtain a copy of any of NELF's briefs, contact us at info@nelfonline.org.

    Categories

    All
    1st Circuit Court Of Appeals
    2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    3rd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    Business Litigation Session
    CT
    CT Superior Court
    CT Supreme Court
    Employer Employee Relationships
    February 2018
    February 2019
    Government Regulation/Administration Of Justice
    MA
    MA Appeals Court
    MA Division Of Administrative Law Appeals
    March 2015
    MA Superior Court
    MA Supreme Judicial Court
    MA US District Court
    ME
    ME Supreme Judicial Court
    NH
    NH Supreme Court
    Property Rights
    RI
    RI Supreme Court
    SCOTUS
    United States Supreme Court
    US Court Of Appeals Federal Circuit
    US District Court ME
    VT
    VT Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    June 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    June 2011
    February 2011
    October 2010
    June 2010
    February 2010
    October 2009
    February 2009
    October 2008
    June 2008
    February 2008
    October 2007
    June 2007
    October 2006
    June 2006
    February 2006
    October 2005
    June 2005
    February 2005
    October 2004
    June 2004
    February 2004
    October 2003
    May 2003
    February 2003
    September 2002
    May 2002
    February 2002
    May 2001