New England Legal Foundation
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Annual Reports
    • Board of Directors
    • State Advisory Councils >
      • Connecticut
      • Maine
      • Massachusetts
      • New Hampshire
      • Rhode Island
      • Vermont
    • Trustees
    • Members
    • Staff
    • Job & Internship Opportunities
  • News & Events
  • Docket
  • Briefs
  • Donate
  • Contact

Swift v. AutoZone, Inc.

6/9/2004

 
Protecting Retail Employers from Double Overtime Payments

Under the Massachusetts Sunday premium pay law most retailers must pay an employee time-and-a-half his regular wages for working on a Sunday.  Under the Massachusetts Overtime Law, an employer must also pay a non-exempt employee time-and-a-half for any work exceeding 40 hours per week.  AutoZone, an auto parts retailer, has a pay policy that credits an employee’s Sunday premium pay toward overtime pay due in the same week.  For example, if an AutoZone employee works 8 hours on a Sunday and 40 more hours in the same week, totaling 48 hours, the employee will receive 40 hours of regular pay and 8 hours of pay at time-and-a-half but will not receive double pay for the hours worked on a Sunday.

AutoZone employees Joseph Swift and Edward Cove filed a class-action lawsuit challenging AutoZone’s pay policy, arguing that they were entitled to time-and-a-half pay for both Sunday hours and overtime hours worked in the same week.  The Superior Court ruled that AutoZone’s policy violated the Overtime Law and reported to the Appeals Court the question whether an employer may offset Sunday premium payments against overtime pay. The Supreme Judicial Court then took the case for direct appellate review.  Four months after the Superior Court’s decision while the case was pending before the Supreme Judicial Court, the Legislature enacted emergency legislation amending the Overtime Law to allow employers to credit Sunday or holiday premium pay toward overtime pay.  The Supreme Judicial Court reversed the Superior Court and ruled in AutoZone’s favor.  

NELF joined an amicus brief filed by the Associated Industries of Massachusetts and others, arguing primarily that if two statutes require a person to do the same thing, that person need not do the same thing twice.  Amici also argued that the Superior Court’s interpretation was inconsistent with legislative intent, because nowhere has the Legislature authorized double time for hours worked on a Sunday and in excess of 40 hours in the same week.  The Supreme Judicial Court agreed, and held that an employer may offset Sunday premium pay against overtime pay.  “If two statutes require an employer to do the same thing, there is no rule of statutory construction that compels the employer to do so twice.”  The Court also observed that the 2003 emergency statute permitting crediting is strongly suggestive of the Legislature’s original intent when it first enacted the Overtime Law in 1960.


Comments are closed.

    The Docket

    To obtain a copy of any of NELF's briefs, contact us at info@nelfonline.org.

    Categories

    All
    1st Circuit Court Of Appeals
    2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    3rd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    Business Litigation Session
    CT
    CT Superior Court
    CT Supreme Court
    Employer Employee Relationships
    February 2018
    February 2019
    Government Regulation/Administration Of Justice
    MA
    MA Appeals Court
    MA Division Of Administrative Law Appeals
    March 2015
    MA Superior Court
    MA Supreme Judicial Court
    MA US District Court
    ME
    ME Supreme Judicial Court
    NH
    NH Supreme Court
    Property Rights
    RI
    RI Supreme Court
    SCOTUS
    United States Supreme Court
    US Court Of Appeals Federal Circuit
    US District Court ME
    VT
    VT Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    June 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    June 2011
    February 2011
    October 2010
    June 2010
    February 2010
    October 2009
    February 2009
    October 2008
    June 2008
    February 2008
    October 2007
    June 2007
    October 2006
    June 2006
    February 2006
    October 2005
    June 2005
    February 2005
    October 2004
    June 2004
    February 2004
    October 2003
    May 2003
    February 2003
    September 2002
    May 2002
    February 2002
    May 2001