New England Legal Foundation
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Annual Reports
    • Board of Directors
    • State Advisory Councils >
      • Connecticut
      • Maine
      • Massachusetts
      • New Hampshire
      • Rhode Island
      • Vermont
    • Trustees
    • Members
    • Staff
    • Job & Internship Opportunities
  • News & Events
  • Docket
  • Briefs
  • Donate
  • Contact

U.S. ex rel. Dawn Barrett v. CIGNA Corporation 

10/7/2009

 
Seeking Recognition of a Government Knowledge Defense to Qui Tam Whistleblower Claims

In this case District Judge Wolf of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts entertained a summary judgment motion seeking dismissal of this whistleblower action, which alleges that CIGNA violated the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 – 33, (“FCA”) by requiring claimants under its long-term disability (“LTD”) policies to file claims for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) even though CIGNA knew or should have known that many of those claimants were ineligible for SSDI benefits.  

NELF submitted an amicus brief in the case in support of CIGNA’s summary judgment motion, seeking recognition and application of a government knowledge defense to qui tam claims.  It was undisputed that requiring individuals seeking benefits under private LTD policies to apply to the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) for SSDI benefits is a longstanding, industry-wide practice.  In fact, many public providers of disability benefits, including the federal government and numerous state agencies, have for decades also required their claimants to apply for SSDI benefits.  In light of these and other undisputed facts, NELF argued that Barrett cannot prove that CIGNA was acting with the requisite scienter in causing the alleged false claims to be filed because neither CIGNA nor the SSA treated those claims as representations of eligibility.  The claims were instead intended to be, and were in fact, treated by the SSA as requests for official determinations of eligibility.  Given the SSA’s knowledge of and acquiescence in this widespread practice, NELF argued, CIGNA should not be found to have acted with the requisite fraudulent intent and Barrett could not prove that the alleged false claims of eligibility were material to SSA’s decision-making.  In addition, NELF argued that recognition of an FCA claim in the circumstances presented here would undermine two aspects of the rule of law essential for a healthy economy – namely, certainty and predictability.  Longstanding and transparent, industry-wide business conduct that is both accepted and followed by the government should not be susceptible to after-the-fact characterization as fraudulent behavior.  

Judge Wolf, ruling from the bench at oral argument, acknowledged the possible viability of a government knowledge defense to a qui tam whistleblower action but concluded that there were disputed questions of fact here about the extent of the SSA’s knowledge regarding the disputed practice that precluded the entry of summary judgment. 

Comments are closed.

    The Docket

    To obtain a copy of any of NELF's briefs, contact us at info@nelfonline.org.

    Categories

    All
    1st Circuit Court Of Appeals
    2nd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    3rd Circuit Court Of Appeals
    Business Litigation Session
    CT
    CT Superior Court
    CT Supreme Court
    Employer Employee Relationships
    February 2018
    February 2019
    Government Regulation/Administration Of Justice
    MA
    MA Appeals Court
    MA Division Of Administrative Law Appeals
    March 2015
    MA Superior Court
    MA Supreme Judicial Court
    MA US District Court
    ME
    ME Supreme Judicial Court
    NH
    NH Supreme Court
    Property Rights
    RI
    RI Supreme Court
    SCOTUS
    United States Supreme Court
    US Court Of Appeals Federal Circuit
    US District Court ME
    VT
    VT Supreme Court

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    June 2013
    February 2013
    October 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    June 2011
    February 2011
    October 2010
    June 2010
    February 2010
    October 2009
    February 2009
    October 2008
    June 2008
    February 2008
    October 2007
    June 2007
    October 2006
    June 2006
    February 2006
    October 2005
    June 2005
    February 2005
    October 2004
    June 2004
    February 2004
    October 2003
    May 2003
    February 2003
    September 2002
    May 2002
    February 2002
    May 2001